Comparison of TAT and Myers-Briggs
This is a comparison between the projective measure of personality Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) and the objective measure of personality (Myers-Briggs) and the theories that underlie them where applicable. There are two main measurement categories of personality tests: projective and objective. Projective tests are unstructured and are classified into five categories such as association techniques, construction of stories, completion of sentences, arranging of pictures, and expressions with play. Objective tests are structured and classified into self-report inventories and behavioral assessments.
Projective personality tests are heavily based on Freud’s psychoanalytic theory. Examples of projective tests are the Rorschach and the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT). Psychoanalytic Theory had a great impact on the clinical practice of projective testing. The impact was attributed to the work of Rapaport (1945-1946) and others in integrating the psychoanalytic model of the mind with psychological testing (Sugarman et al, 2000). Psychoanalytic theory allowed the psychologist to expand the number of data sources available in testing. Objective personality tests are heavily based theory-guided inventories. Example objective test MBTI was based on Jung’s theory of Typology. According to Jung, a typology is a great help in understanding the wide variations that occur among individuals, and it also furnishes a clue to the fundamental difference in the current psychological theories (McCaulley, 2000). Jung’s typology assumed every human being uses four basic mental processes or functions.
Projective analysis is based on the assumption that personal interpretations of ambiguous stimuli must reflect unconscious needs, motives, and conflicts. TAT is a projective test that uses the construction technique. In administering the TAT, the examiner requests the examinee to make up a dramatic story for each of 30 pictures presented. In contrast, the essence of Jung’s Personality Typology theory is that much seemingly random variation in behavior is actually quite orderly and consistent, being due to basic differences in the way individuals prefer to use their perception and judgment. Perception may involve various ways of becoming aware of things, people, or ideas. Judgment involves all the ways of coming to conclusions about what has been perceived. If people differ systematically in what they perceive and in how they reach conclusions, then it is only reasonable for them to differ correspondingly in their interests, reactions, values, motivations, and skills (McCaulley, 2000). Given Jung’s typology, McCaulley asserted that the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator® (MBTI) can be a bridge between the world of organizations making decisions and world of counseling.
Projective tests are used more often in clinical settings in order to characterize anomalies such as memory losses or learning disabilities. Objective tests such as MBTI are used in job placements and organizations within work groups.
References
Gregory, R. J. (2007). Psychological testing: History, principles, and applications (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
McCaulley, M. H. (2000). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. A Bridge Between Counseling and Consulting. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, Vol. 52, No. 2, 117-132
Sugarman, A., Kanner, K. (2000). The Contribution of Psychoanalytic Theory to Psychological Testing. Psychoanalytic Psychology. Vol 17. No. 1, 3-23
Respond